Bug 535796 (RHQ-2455)

Summary:	update XmlJavaTypeAdapters to consistently handle both client and server side adaptations AND return list of IDs for references nulled out for cycles/serialization
Product:	[Other] RHQ Project	Reporter:	Simeon Pinder <spinder>
Component:	Web Services	Assignee:	Simeon Pinder <spinder>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	1.3	CC:	cwelton, jshaughn
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	CodeChange, SubBug
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
URL:	http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-2455
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:	All known
Last Closed:	2014-05-09 16:00:42 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	625146

Description Simeon Pinder 2009-10-05 17:38:00 UTC

During fixes for 2.3 it was discovered that the xmlJavaTypeAdapter implementations were not consistently implemented across the board for Webservices.  In some cases the adapter was only needed on one side(client/server) for implementations tested.  These should be consistently implemented.

Additionally for all the locations where @XmlTransients were applied to eliminate cycles for serializations and an XmlJavaType adapter is being used, it would be a useful enhancement to return those additional ids to the client as list of integers to the client.  This would be a convenience to the WS clients so that it would be clearer how to reconstruct the full object trees if such a thing is desired.

Comment 1 Red Hat Bugzilla 2009-11-10 21:04:46 UTC

This bug was previously known as http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-2455

Comment 2 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:54:30 UTC

Temporarily adding the keyword "SubBug" so we can be sure we have accounted for all the bugs.

keyword:
new = Tracking + FutureFeature + SubBug

Comment 3 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:59:55 UTC

making sure we're not missing any bugs in rhq_triage

Comment 4 Jay Shaughnessy 2014-05-09 16:00:42 UTC

WS are gone.