Bug 535796 (RHQ-2455)

Summary: update XmlJavaTypeAdapters to consistently handle both client and server side adaptations AND return list of IDs for references nulled out for cycles/serialization
Product: [Other] RHQ Project Reporter: Simeon Pinder <spinder>
Component: Web ServicesAssignee: Simeon Pinder <spinder>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 1.3CC: cwelton, jshaughn
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: CodeChange, SubBug
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
URL: http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-2455
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
All known
Last Closed: 2014-05-09 12:00:42 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 625146    

Description Simeon Pinder 2009-10-05 13:38:00 EDT
During fixes for 2.3 it was discovered that the xmlJavaTypeAdapter implementations were not consistently implemented across the board for Webservices.  In some cases the adapter was only needed on one side(client/server) for implementations tested.  These should be consistently implemented.

Additionally for all the locations where @XmlTransients were applied to eliminate cycles for serializations and an XmlJavaType adapter is being used, it would be a useful enhancement to return those additional ids to the client as list of integers to the client.  This would be a convenience to the WS clients so that it would be clearer how to reconstruct the full object trees if such a thing is desired.  
Comment 1 Red Hat Bugzilla 2009-11-10 16:04:46 EST
This bug was previously known as http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-2455
Comment 2 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 11:54:30 EST
Temporarily adding the keyword "SubBug" so we can be sure we have accounted for all the bugs.

new = Tracking + FutureFeature + SubBug
Comment 3 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 11:59:55 EST
making sure we're not missing any bugs in rhq_triage
Comment 4 Jay Shaughnessy 2014-05-09 12:00:42 EDT
WS are gone.