Bug 536321 (RHQ-684)
Summary: | [RFE] Group definition groupBy pattern subMatch | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] RHQ Project | Reporter: | Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn> |
Component: | Inventory | Assignee: | Charles Crouch <ccrouch> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | asantos, cwelton, hbrock |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Improvement, SubFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
URL: | http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-684 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: |
Any
|
|
Last Closed: | 2014-05-15 20:18:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 536002, 678340 |
Description
Jay Shaughnessy
2008-07-16 19:35:00 UTC
jay, i believe this functionality already exists. though, it's perfectly possible that it did not when you filed this jira. i tested some of your scenarios, and they work just fine without error. can you test some more permutations and then either re-open or close as appropriate? oph, nevermind. i used your first two examples. this jira is really a proposition for the one at the bottom. This bug was previously known as http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-684 |