Bug 536345 (RHQ-704)
Summary: | UpTime metric on RHQ Agent resource type should not be tracked for baseline OOBs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] RHQ Project | Reporter: | Ian Springer <ian.springer> |
Component: | Plugins | Assignee: | RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Mike Foley <mfoley> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 1.1pre | CC: | asantos, ccrouch, jshaughn |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Improvement |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
URL: | http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-704 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-05-15 21:00:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ian Springer
2008-07-31 18:14:00 UTC
1) sounds like the way to go - better extend 'seconds' to all time units. But then there are metrics like "cpu time spent in user mode" where a per minute metric makes sense. 2) Adds a lot of stuff to the whole data model An alternative could be to add a 'perMinute' attribute to the schema, that is true by default and which only gets parsed in org.rhq.core.clientapi.agent.metadata.MetricsMetadataParser.parseMetricsMetadata(MetricDescriptor, ResourceType) in the if-clause to determine if per minute data should be created. This new attribute would only apply to trendsup/down. Or we could create trends{up,down}nopermin measurement types I'm thinking we just get rid of this metric. What happens if we remove metric defs from a descriptor? Can the metadata manager remove it and all data/alerts/etc associated with it? This bug was previously known as http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-704 Still there, I think we could remove it but it seems like it's not a big deal. |