Bug 537249

Summary: RHQ tables containing rows with checkboxes do not remember what is checked between paginations
Product: [Other] RHQ Project Reporter: John Sefler <jsefler>
Component: Core UIAssignee: RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: John Sefler <jsefler>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: unspecifiedCC: cwelton, mazz
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: SubBug
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-02-17 17:13:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 562594, 565628, 585306, 591531    

Description John Sefler 2009-11-12 22:21:32 UTC 
Description of problem:
RHQ tables containing rows with checkboxes do not remember what is checked between paginations.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. create many (20+) Repositories so that the "Total" in the table exceeds the number of "Items Per Page"
2. select some repositories by checking their checkboxes
3. paginate to the next page of the "Repositories" table
4. paginate back to the prior page
  
Actual results:
The originally checked rows in the table are now unchecked.

Expected results:
The originally checked rows should remain checked.

Additional info:
Satellite solved this same issue for multiply selected rows across paginated tables.
Comment 1 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:59:01 UTC 
Temporarily adding the keyword "SubBug" so we can be sure we have accounted for all the bugs.

keyword:
new = Tracking + FutureFeature + SubBug
Comment 2 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 17:03:47 UTC 
making sure we're not missing any bugs in rhq_triage
Comment 3 Charles Crouch 2010-05-13 19:30:13 UTC 
I'm guessing this isnt a regression?
Comment 4 John Sefler 2010-05-13 20:24:43 UTC 
no - not a regression - same behaviour in jon 2.2, 2.3 - resource checkboxes spanning multiple paginated pages do not retain their checked state.
Comment 5 John Mazzitelli 2011-02-17 17:13:25 UTC 
this is jsf related.. this issue isn't with gwt