Bug 537527

Summary:	Review request: jgraphx - Graph component for Java
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	D Haley <mycae>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	c.david86, dwheeler, fedora-package-review, lkundrak, notting, sylvestre
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-04-29 10:36:17 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description D Haley 2009-11-14 02:15:41 UTC

SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jgraphx.spec
SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jgraphx-1.0.2.8-1.fc10.src.rpm


Jgraphx is the a lightweight and feature-rich graph component for Java,
and the successor to jgraph. It provides automatic 2D layout and routing
for diagrams.  Object and relations can be displayed in any Swing UI
via provided zoomable component.


Koji:
F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1805838


Note that the spec is essentially a modified version of what is in bug 532203

Comment 1 David A. Wheeler 2010-01-27 22:57:49 UTC

I couldn't download the files from http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jgraphx-1.0.2.8-1.fc10.src.rpm, so I couldn't do a review.
Server down?

Comment 2 D Haley 2010-01-28 10:02:09 UTC

Sorry,The server had to be taken offline permanently. I am quite busy at the moment but will be uploading my hosted packages to fedorahosted "soon"

Comment 3 Sylvestre Ledru 2010-01-28 10:22:44 UTC

(In reply to comment #2)
You can send it on my email if it helps. I will upload them on the web somewhere.

Comment 4 Lubomir Rintel 2010-04-29 10:17:21 UTC

Still no progress here?

Comment 5 Lubomir Rintel 2010-04-29 10:36:17 UTC

Marking the review as dead.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 587198 ***