Bug 537639
Summary: | Review Request: hyena - A C# library used to make awesome applications | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sebastian Dziallas <sebastian> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | bnocera, fedora-package-review, notting, sundaram |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-06-22 10:32:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 537640 |
Description
Sebastian Dziallas
2009-11-15 11:48:31 UTC
It would be more useful to users to get a functional description instead of a marketing description of the app. Yeah, agreed. Maybe something like "A library of C# classes" would make more sense. From what I understand, this is not really more than a small dependency, so I wouldn't expect too many people users to worry about taking it into production use. Anyway, your point is valid. I'll change this with the next release. Alright, here's a quick update. I missed the fact that the devel package should require the main package. That's fixed now. I also tweaked the summary line a little; nothing big, though. Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/hyena.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/hyena-0.2-2.fc13.src.rpm Bug 530910 is a duplicate, with a reviewer and updated versions. Closing this as a duplicate, given that I don't mind handing this off (and that there's actually a reviewer in the other ticket). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 530910 *** |