Bug 53777
Summary: | fftw pr dfftw? rfftw or drfftw? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Powertools | Reporter: | Need Real Name <ted> |
Component: | fftw | Assignee: | bero |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.1 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-01-17 15:44:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Need Real Name
2001-09-18 13:32:03 UTC
Since Powertools was discontinued and this is not bad enough to warrant an errata release, there is nothing I can do about it, unfortunately (so the official fix is the removal of the package from current products). To your question: Red Hat did not rename fftw to dfftw. If fftw is built both in single-precision and double-precision mode, the fftw build process automatically names the binaries sfftw (s.p.) and dfftw (d.p.). The fftw.org RPM probably supports only one of them. |