Bug 538129
| Summary: | "mpath" missing in default generic.prm, which prevents customers to do scsi multipath installation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Gonzalo Muelas Serrano <gmuelas> |
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | David Cantrell <dcantrell> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5.5 | CC: | bhinson, brueckner, hpicht, jjarvis, jstodola |
| Target Milestone: | alpha | ||
| Target Release: | 5.5 | ||
| Hardware: | s390x | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | anaconda-11.1.2.200-1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-03-30 08:01:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 481160 | ||
|
Description
Gonzalo Muelas Serrano
2009-11-17 17:37:37 UTC
Is 'mpath' a safe no-op on systems that are DASD-only? That is, if you don't need the parameter, does it hurt to include it? From what I have tested with DASD only systems where I include the "mpath" modifiying generic.prm manually, it is safe and it does not hurt to include it. Patch to address this issue: diff --git a/bootdisk/s390/generic.prm b/bootdisk/s390/generic.prm index e468761..afecff0 100644 --- a/bootdisk/s390/generic.prm +++ b/bootdisk/s390/generic.prm @@ -1 +1 @@ -root=/dev/ram0 ro ip=off ramdisk_size=40000 +root=/dev/ram0 ro ip=off ramdisk_size=40000 mpath diff --git a/bootdisk/s390x/generic.prm b/bootdisk/s390x/generic.prm index e468761..afecff0 100644 --- a/bootdisk/s390x/generic.prm +++ b/bootdisk/s390x/generic.prm @@ -1 +1 @@ -root=/dev/ram0 ro ip=off ramdisk_size=40000 +root=/dev/ram0 ro ip=off ramdisk_size=40000 mpath Would like to include this in RHEL 5.5 if possible because it's simple. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. This enhancement request was evaluated by the full Red Hat Enterprise Linux team for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux minor release. As a result of this evaluation, Red Hat has tentatively approved inclusion of this feature in the next Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update minor release. While it is a goal to include this enhancement in the next minor release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the enhancement is not yet committed for inclusion in the next minor release pending the next phase of actual code integration and successful Red Hat and partner testing. generic.prm from RHEL5.5-Server-20100129.nightly (with anaconda-11.1.2.202-2) contains: root=/dev/ram0 ro ip=off ramdisk_size=40000 mpath Moving to VERIFIED. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0194.html |