Bug 538299

Summary:	Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Stjepan Gros <stjepan.gros>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, huzaifas, notting, pahan, roysjosh, xavier
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-02-06 21:17:50 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	538297
Bug Blocks:

Description Stjepan Gros 2009-11-18 07:30:29 UTC

Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas/openvas-client.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas/openvas-client-2.0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description:
OpenVAS-Client is a client component that is used to access and control
OpenVAS server. It is also used to perform analysis task of results
provided by the server component.

Comment 1 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-22 11:02:19 UTC

*** Bug 541494 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Pavel Alexeev 2010-01-02 16:58:32 UTC

For new package you shouldn't use vendor tag for desktop-file.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage

Also missing BR glib. Build package failed - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1898860

Comment 3 Joshua Roys 2010-01-04 16:51:32 UTC

OpenVAS 3.0.0 was released recently.

Comment 4 Stjepan Gros 2010-02-06 21:17:50 UTC

I'm closing this bug report since it is superseded by a new major release. Desktop and BR I'll fix in next iteration.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 562470 ***