Bug 539153

Summary: FTBFS libdrm-2.4.15-4.fc12
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: FTBFS <ftbfs>
Component: libdrmAssignee: Adam Jackson <ajax>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: rawhideCC: ajax
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-11-24 15:30:40 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 538681    
Attachments:
Description Flags
root.log
none
build.log
none
mock.log none

Description FTBFS 2009-11-19 17:01:13 UTC
libdrm-2.4.15-4.fc12.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.

Comment 1 FTBFS 2009-11-19 17:01:17 UTC
Setting to ASSIGNED per Fedora Bug Triage workflow.  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow

Comment 2 FTBFS 2009-11-19 17:01:20 UTC
Created attachment 371895 [details]
root.log

root.log for i386

Comment 3 FTBFS 2009-11-19 17:01:22 UTC
Created attachment 371896 [details]
build.log

build.log for i386

Comment 4 FTBFS 2009-11-19 17:01:24 UTC
Created attachment 371897 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for i386

Comment 5 Adam Jackson 2009-11-20 21:29:48 UTC
checking for native atomic primitives... none

Yeah, that's not good.  Don't know what the difference is between your build and mine, works here.

Comment 6 Adam Jackson 2009-11-24 15:30:40 UTC
I rebuilt libdrm-2.4.15-5.fc12 in a scratch build in koji and it works fine, so I'm going to say this is a failure of your build setup.