Bug 539765
Summary: | Attempts to connect to 255.255.255.255 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matt McCutchen <matt> |
Component: | cvsps | Assignee: | Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 11 | CC: | florian.laroche, michel, ville.skytta |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-03-15 05:15:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matt McCutchen
2009-11-21 00:42:18 UTC
Thanks for the detailed report and sorry about the delay. Building with -DLINUX circumvents the issue and is a patch-free approach, so I opted to use that. Updates will follow shortly. cvsps-2.2-0.5.b1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cvsps-2.2-0.5.b1.fc12 cvsps-2.2-0.5.b1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cvsps-2.2-0.5.b1.fc11 cvsps-2.1-7.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cvsps-2.1-7.el5 cvsps-2.2-0.5.b1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cvsps'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13603 All the updates linked above were pushed to stable on 2010-01-12. The update system should have closed this bug. This patch is not included in rhel6. regards, Florian La Roche I suggest contacting the RHEL6 cvsps maintainer, and while at it, checking whether the RHEL6 one will properly update the EPEL5 one. |