Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||netgen-mesher - automatic 3d tetrahedral mesh generator|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||fedora-package-review, notting, tomspur|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2010-01-22 17:19:30 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description nuovodna 2009-11-21 07:43:51 EST
SPEC file:http://pastebin.com/m6909a2de NETGEN is an automatic 3d tetrahedral mesh generator. It accepts input from constructive solid geometry (CSG) or boundary representation (BRep) from STL file format. It requires togl v 1.7 library URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/togl/files/ SPEC file : http://pastebin.com/m6a68a615
Comment 2 Thomas Spura 2009-11-23 15:55:42 EST
Just a few comments, because I'm no sponsor anyway: - You are not yet in the packager group and therefor you need a sponsor for your fist package, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor - Is this Review Requrest about togl17 or netgen? If you want to have both in fedora, you should have added 2 review requests. - Could you upload the SPEC *and* SRPM to somewhere on the web and not just pastebin? The first SPEC isn't available anymore... - See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines for details about how packaging should be done. e.g. to the togl17 spec: That package owns /* which is not what you want. The package must only own the directories it creates and the subfiles/folders. Guessing in netgen you did the same.
Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-08 02:22:10 EST
Still no SRPM, and both spec URLs have been invalid for some time. Marking as NotReady; I guess I'll close this soon unless something we can actually review appears. If you do want to submit these packages, please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers, file a proper review ticket for each package, and also request hosting (as indicated in that document) so that you can have a proper place to put the spec and srpm files. Pastebin just won't do for obvious reasons, and we do also require that you provide an SRPM.
Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-22 17:19:30 EST
Soon has come and gone with no response, so I'll close this.