Bug 540140
| Summary: | 404's when downloading prestodelta.xml | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jonathan Dieter <jonathan> |
| Component: | yum-presto | Assignee: | Jonathan Dieter <jonathan> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 12 | CC: | james.antill, jonathan, tim.lauridsen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-12-11 08:03:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jonathan Dieter
2009-11-22 15:07:25 UTC
by the time presto data is grabbed it's a bit late to invalidate the metadata, I would think. And I'm confused how the metadata is current enough for the pkgs to be downloaded but not for the presto data? it should be the same, I would think. (In reply to comment #1) > by the time presto data is grabbed it's a bit late to invalidate the metadata, > I would think. Fair enough. > And I'm confused how the metadata is current enough for the pkgs to be > downloaded but not for the presto data? it should be the same, I would think. After a new push, most of the packages haven't changed, so the old metadata is mostly right. For the few cases it's wrong that a user would notice (as far as I can see, it would have to be a package updated twice in two sequential pushes), you would get 404's for the missing packages. prestodelta's name changes after *every* push, so you get a 404 every time you use the old metadata. I do want to point out that I've only seen two people complaining about this on IRC, and a 'yum clean metadata' fixed it for them. It may be that we're better off doing nothing here. I think it's odd that things are not timing out properly but unless it starts happening all over we should probably wait it out. Ok, going to close as WONTFIX; if we run into problems, we'll reopen. |