Bug 541231
Summary: | RFE: Provide a "developer" mode server/agent | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] RHQ Project | Reporter: | Heiko W. Rupp <hrupp> |
Component: | Core Server | Assignee: | Nobody <nobody> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | jshaughn |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Improvement, SubBug |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 565628 |
Description
Heiko W. Rupp
2009-11-25 10:06:24 UTC
Temporarily adding the keyword "SubBug" so we can be sure we have accounted for all the bugs. keyword: new = Tracking + FutureFeature + SubBug making sure we're not missing any bugs in rhq_triage - scan intervals are much shorter agreed. - for plugin deployment only timestamp is relevant i wouldn't want to change the algorithm for calculating whether we have a new plugin - if we can't use the algorithm that's leveraged in customer environments, then something is severely flawed. are these particular bugs you see in the product today heiko? - agent could periodically run "plugins update" agreed, auto-sync of the newest plugins would be nice. perhaps this could be accomplished by a server-side plugin. - debug logging is automatically enabled for which categories? enabling debugging for everything would be a debug log storm. and the log4j file on the server is automatically reloading, so there wouldn't be much gained there. i suppose it could be argued that running the agent in debug mode would be a win. - web app reloading is on by default isn't it already in a dev build (-Pdev)? |