Bug 541990
| Summary: | Pop-up that says, Unable to mount [nfs4] filesystem during install | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dennis Flaherty <dennisf> |
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 12 | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, hdegoede, jvonau3, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-11-30 09:14:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Dennis Flaherty
2009-11-27 20:45:40 UTC
This looks to be a dup of 541473 That appears reasonable for the misspelling. I'm still curious though, why even try to mount the bind points? They only exist to allow nfs4 clients to connect to my server. -Q The misspelling indeed seems to be a duplicate of bug 541473. (In reply to comment #2) > That appears reasonable for the misspelling. I'm still curious though, why > even try to mount the bind points? They only exist to allow nfs4 clients to > connect to my server. > Because we do not know that, when doing an upgrade we simply mount everything in /etc/fstab, so that when we do the upgrade and some package installs packages to some path, they always end up in the right place. People can do very funny things, to their system so this is the only sane way to make sure we have all storage mounted in the right place before starting to upgrade packages. As for the failing of the mount command, that could very well be caused by bug 541473 too, or by something else. Since you've already upgraded your system we won't know as upgrading twice is not possible, so I'm going to close this a duplicate of bug 541473. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 541473 *** |