Bug 542565

Summary:	[Upgrade Request] Upgrade goffice to the latest
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas>
Component:	goffice	Assignee:	Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	belegdol, huzaifas, notting
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-12-01 06:58:31 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	541827

Description Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-11-30 07:52:49 UTC

Hi,
Can we upgrade goffice to the latest, in rawhide?
I already have a SPEC and SRPM
But since you guys are co-maintaining i think i should ask :)
SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/goffice.spec
SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/goffice-0.7.16-1.fc12.src.rpm

Comment 1 Julian Sikorski 2009-11-30 07:58:46 UTC

Sure, why not. gnome-chemistry-utils is ready for it, gnucash as well afaik. So if you update gnumeric to 1.9 everything should be fine.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2009-12-01 03:59:00 UTC

Both the gnucash 2.3.x development branch and the gnucash-2.2.x release branch have configure checks for goffice >= 0.7.0, so presumably it works. I haven't tested it myself, but I don't object to the upgrade in rawhide; we can work on any issues once it lands.

Comment 3 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-01 06:58:31 UTC

goffice-0.7.16-2.fc13 is build for dist-f13 now.