Bug 543689
| Summary: | Package review: libipathverbs - Driver library for libibverbs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Doug Ledford <dledford> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | bugs.michael, fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | bugs.michael:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-01-03 21:00:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Doug Ledford
2009-12-02 21:14:25 UTC
The same questions I've added to "libnes" apply here. Not just because of the virtual Provides this looks more like a driver/module/plugin than an ordinary shared library for software development. Without any dependency on a package that provides some headers it's questionable to create the two -devel packages. Ditto the responses in the libnes bug. You are correct that this is a driver plugin or libibverbs and not something directly usable by the user. * Correct Source URL would be: http://www.openfabrics.org/downloads/libipathverbs/libipathverbs-1.2.tar.gz $ sha1sum libipathverbs-1.2.tar.gz 462c07f85b4d568ef72846865ee48ba0af4bb015 libipathverbs-1.2.tar.gz > Provides: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} Nowadays, automatic package name "Provides" would also add a second target-specific Provides for %{?_isa}, so also adding that one to explicit Provides would make sense: %if "no%{?_isa}" != "no" Provides: %{name}-devel%{_isa} = %{version}-%{release} %endif * openSUSE also build the package for 32-bit and only "ExcludeArch: s390 s390x". A .spec comment explaining your "ExlusiveArch: x86_64" would be helpful. The spec file included in the tarball is not excluding x86 either. But it may be mistaken, since it also marks /etc/libibverbs.d/ipath.driver as %config, which you've said would be incorrect. * Verified: $ repoquery --whatprovides /etc/libibverbs.d libibverbs-0:1.1.3-4.fc13.i686 libibverbs-0:1.1.3-4.fc13.x86_64 Directory meanwhile is owned correctly by libiverbs. * ldconfig calls not needed. They would be useless due to the chosen driver library SONAME. * Placement of the static driver lib in a separate -static subpackage follows the packaging guidelines. * There are three other libibverbs-driver packages, which are packaged in the same way. Things mentioned in this comment could be fixed in fedora pkg cvs, so: APPROVED Michael, thanks for the review. Rel-eng: I'd like an F-13 and devel branch for the package. Please add a cvs template here (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests ) and reset the fedora-cvs flag to ? New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libipathverbs Short Description: Hardware driver for QLogic iPath hardware, used by libibverbs Owners: dledford Branches: F-13,devel InitialCC: CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). |