Bug 54587

Summary:	raidtools-0.90-23 dynamic links to popt libs on /usr partition
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide	Reporter:	edwinh <edwinh>
Component:	raidtools	Assignee:	Matt Wilson <msw>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	1.0
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-10-13 04:13:07 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description edwinh 2001-10-13 04:13:03 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5+) Gecko/20011012

(From rawhide 20011003)

Description of problem:
raidtools-0.90-23 is dynamically linked with popt (recent change).  This is
a problem since popt is in /usr, which may not be the root partition.

ldd /sbin/raidstart 
	libpopt.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0 (0x4002b000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x40032000)
	/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

raid setup in rc.sysinit will fail to start up raid when only 
root is mounted and you have a separate /usr...


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. use raidtools-0.90-23
2. have a separate /usr partition
3. have software raid setup
	

Actual Results:  breakage during rc.sysinit when raidstart etc runs

Expected Results:  static link libpopt if we don't want to move it to /lib?


Additional info:

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2001-10-15 14:28:54 UTC

Fixed in 0.90-24.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2001-10-29 16:46:09 UTC

*** Bug 55198 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2001-10-29 16:46:20 UTC

*** Bug 55304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2001-10-29 19:07:01 UTC

*** Bug 55075 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***