Bug 54657
Summary: | software RAID/Disk Druid issues | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Chris Runge <crunge> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.3 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-10-15 20:06:30 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Chris Runge
2001-10-15 16:05:18 UTC
Two separate problems here really, both of which are elsewhere I'm pretty sure, but I'll just go ahead and clarify the problems and look for the older bugs later. Problem #1: Partitions aren't strongly ordered in Disk Druid and if you have a lot of partitions which are the same size, then there is no way to differentiate between them. This is definitely somewhere in bugzilla and has the tentative patch which is probably going to go in to make the partition ordering much stronger so that you can have predictability there; it was just too large of a change for me to feel comfortable about it when it was reported. Problem #2: Kickstart doesn't allow you to specify "I want a partition this size and I want it to be sdXY". If you do part raid.01 --size 1500 part raid.02 --size 1500 You can easily ensure that raid.01 and raid.02 are the partitions included in your RAID device, but where raid.01 and raid.02 end up isn't well-defined for the same reason as above and also you can't override and force it to be created as sdXY (which may well not happen just because of how it doesn't fit in with things) I suppose one solution to this problem would be to have, at least as an option, anaconda/kickstart/whatever ensure that partitions that make up a given RAID device fall within the same cylinder boundaries. Is this possible? Users shouldn't have to know that this ensures the highest levels of speed when using software RAID. This is an enhancement pretty much covered by existing bugzilla requests. I'll let katzj roll it up. We have some thoughts about making a RAID wizard type of thing which would encompass trying to do things like that. I think this situation would be best handled by the using the 'by cylinder' partitioning option now available in anaconda. The rest of the request is handled by existing bugzilla requests. |