Bug 546871
Summary: | Review Request: qpixman - Modified version of pixman for spice | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jeroen van Meeuwen <vanmeeuwen+fedora> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | cfergeau, fedora-package-review, negativo17, notting, sundaram |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | NotReady | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-05-11 11:44:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 546872 |
Description
Jeroen van Meeuwen
2009-12-12 12:19:44 UTC
Why aren't these patches being pushed upstream? I don't think we should be importing Spice forked versions like this. Very good point. FWIW, I'm actually taking issue with this ignorant behaviour of qpixman's upstream. That's why I want the stack to be in Fedora; so that we, once more, may lead by example. Nothing to review here -> NotReady [ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#The_Whiteboard ] spice no longer needs a modified pixman version, I think this bug can be closed. Closing this bug down, now Spice is integrated everywhere. |