Bug 547867
| Summary: | %{ghc_version} doesn't expand properly | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jochen Schmitt <jochen> |
| Component: | ghc-rpm-macros | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | haskell-devel, loupgaroublond, petersen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-01-14 09:06:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Thanks for the report - I have a fix that will be coming out in rawhide shortly now that cvs and koji are back after the move. :) Please try 0.3.1 building now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1874097 Though I think I need to warn and post to fedora-haskell-list that there will likely be some more adjustments to the macros and an update needed for cabal2spec for 6.12.1. So you may want to hold off testing a little longer if want something stable to work against, but early testing is welcome. :) |
I want to tryout ghc-6.12.1 on my system and have installed ghc-rpm-macros-0.3.0-1 on my system. Because I have trouble to compile my packages, I have try out the following command: $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' and got the following output: error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) 15< (empty) 14< (empty) 13< (empty) 12< (empty) 11< (empty) 10< (empty) 9< (empty) 8< (empty) 7< (empty) 6< (empty) 5< (empty) 4< (empty) 3< (empty) 2< (empty) 1< (empty) 0< (empty) If I type $ ghc --numeric-version I will get 6.12.1 which I expected for $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt