Bug 548615

Summary: Sudoers renders inconsistent config values in the GUI for Tag Specification (automated testcase)
Product: [Other] RHQ Project Reporter: John Sefler <jsefler>
Component: ConfigurationAssignee: RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: John Sefler <jsefler>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: unspecifiedCC: jshaughn, whayutin
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: SubBug
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-05-16 20:16:41 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 545537, 565628    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Tag Specification is tabulated with "true" and "false" values
none
Tag Specification is configured with "Yes" and "No" radio buttons none

Description John Sefler 2009-12-17 22:25:47 UTC
Created attachment 379109 [details]
Tag Specification is tabulated with "true" and "false" values

Description of problem:
When on the Configuration page of a Sudoers resource, the Entries table renders "true" or "false".  Yest when you go into edit mode to change this value, the radio buttons used to display the value are labeled "Yes" and "No".

If the radio buttons are labeled "Yes" and "No" (as most all of the other boolean configs from other resources), then the Entries table should be consistent and render "Yes" and "No".

See attached screen shots.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Build 87 during sprint 3

Comment 1 John Sefler 2009-12-17 22:26:46 UTC
Created attachment 379110 [details]
Tag Specification is configured with "Yes" and "No" radio buttons

Comment 2 wes hayutin 2010-02-08 19:44:31 UTC
Charles does not want this worked on until the feature is back on the road map,
removing the automation blocker tag.

Comment 3 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:52:28 UTC
Temporarily adding the keyword "SubBug" so we can be sure we have accounted for all the bugs.

keyword:
new = Tracking + FutureFeature + SubBug

Comment 4 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:58:14 UTC
making sure we're not missing any bugs in rhq_triage

Comment 5 Corey Welton 2010-10-05 13:08:21 UTC
Lowering severity/priority - not an enterprise plugin