Bug 5517

Summary:	samba-common missing files after upgrade
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Ian Macdonald <ian>
Component:	rpm	Assignee:	Jeff Johnson <jbj>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.1	CC:	bammi
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	1999-10-29 18:36:39 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ian Macdonald 1999-10-04 21:49:52 UTC

After upgrading from RHL 6.0 to 6.1, samba no longer worked.
Here's why:

[root@caliban ~]# rpm -V samba-common
missing    /etc/codepages
missing    /etc/codepages/src
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.437
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.737
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.850
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.852
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.861
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.866
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.932
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.936
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.949
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.950
missing    /etc/smb.conf

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 1999-10-04 21:52:59 UTC

Exactly which version of samba did you have previously?

Comment 2 Ian Macdonald 1999-10-04 21:55:59 UTC

I was using samba-2.0.5a-1.i386.rpm, which was an official update to
the stock RPM included with RHL 6.0.

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 1999-10-04 22:01:59 UTC

Did you modify the config file at all?

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 1999-10-04 22:16:59 UTC

Do you have an /etc/smb.conf.rpmsave?

Comment 5 Ian Macdonald 1999-10-04 22:27:59 UTC

Yes, I had modified the /etc/smb.conf and yes, it had been saved as
/etc/smb.conf.rpmsave

Comment 6 Bill Nottingham 1999-10-05 15:21:59 UTC

OK. It's some RPM weirdness; we're looking into it.
I can't reproduce the codepages being missing; they still
should be created by the %post script.

Comment 7 Jeff Johnson 2001-01-09 15:21:26 UTC

This was a problem with transaction sets before (IIRC) rpm-3.0.2, long since
fixed.