Bug 552819

Summary:	Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, jose.p.oliveira.oss, notting, perl-devel, tcallawa
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-01-08 07:17:03 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Marcela Mašláňová 2010-01-06 08:43:34 UTC

SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-Tie-IxHash/1.21/10.fc12/src/perl-Tie-IxHash-1.21-10.fc12.src.rpm
Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1426615&filename=perl-Tie-IxHash.spec
Description: This Perl module implements Perl hashes that preserve the order in which the hash elements were added. The order is not affected when values corresponding to existing keys in the IxHash are changed. The elements can also be set to any arbitrary supplied order. The familiar perl array operations can also be performed on the IxHash.

Comment 1 Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-01-06 16:07:23 UTC

Umm, Marcela? This package is already in Fedora...

Comment 2 Marcela Mašláňová 2010-01-07 07:26:40 UTC

Yes, but I didn't find a merge or package review ticket and I need one.

Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-07 20:21:17 UTC

This package was in Extras from before the days before reviews were done in Red Hat's bugzilla.  It was either done on the mailing list or in the fedora.us bugzilla, which is no longer available.

I'm not aware of any Fedora procedure which would require that these packages be re-reviewed (though I don't necessarily think that it would be a terrible idea if only the existing review queue weren't so long).  Could you indicate just why you believe this needs a re-review?

Comment 4 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2010-01-07 21:02:13 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> This package was in Extras from before the days before reviews were done in Red
> Hat's bugzilla.  It was either done on the mailing list or in the fedora.us
> bugzilla, which is no longer available.

The review was done in Fedora US bugzilla (and most likely by Ville Skytta). The announcement is still available here: 
  * http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-17805.html

/jpo

Comment 5 Marcela Mašláňová 2010-01-08 07:17:03 UTC

Thank you, I wasn't aware about it.