Bug 55616
Summary: | ext3 assertion failure with 2.4.9-7.4smp | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Stephen Tweedie <sct> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.3 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | ia64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-11-15 10:33:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jeremy Katz
2001-11-02 22:04:36 UTC
The console message should include a backtrace. Did you capture that? Unfortunately, there wasn't one Did you have a serial console set up? No, the machine is generally reinstalled on a multiple times a day basis for anaconda testing... it just happened to actually sit turned on for a few days for a change and I happened to notice it. Is this box normally reliable? We do Cerberus testing on ia64 regularly and have never seen anything like this, and the last time I got a bad b_jlist report, it turned out to be bad ram. Please reopen this bug if you can reproduce it. |