Bug 556537
Summary: | the RichFaces *dataTable components are missing a number of features needed by RHQ | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] RHQ Project | Reporter: | Ian Springer <ian.springer> |
Component: | Core UI | Assignee: | Ian Springer <ian.springer> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 1.3 | CC: | ccrouch, cwelton |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | SubBug |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-09-30 14:11:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 565628 |
Description
Ian Springer
2010-01-18 16:55:40 UTC
Here's the RF issues we're interested in seeing addressed: 1) https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RF-8269 problems with sorting API (i.e. ExtendedDataModel + Modifiable) that goes with the rich:*dataTable components 2) https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RF-8270 provide a way to render a commandButton based on a minimum and/or maximum number of rows currently selected in a rich:*dataTable 3) https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RF-8271 org.richfaces.model.selection.Selection interface has no JavaDoc / API doc, and it is not very user-friendly 4) https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RF-8272 when in multi sort mode, provide an option to render numbers in each sorted column that indicates the current sort precedence of the column 5) https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RF-711 Special column (with check box) to allow multiple row selection (in dataTable) Temporarily adding the keyword "SubBug" so we can be sure we have accounted for all the bugs. keyword: new = Tracking + FutureFeature + SubBug making sure we're not missing any bugs in rhq_triage closing per gwt efforts |