Bug 556937

Summary: Missing dependency in latest updates
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Andrig Miller <andrig.t.miller>
Component: mesa-libGLwAssignee: Adam Jackson <ajax>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: ajax, madko
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-01-20 07:55:07 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Andrig Miller 2010-01-19 21:20:01 UTC
Description of problem:

In the updates that went out today, mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12 requires libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 (for both i686 and x86_64), and that libdrm version is not part of the udpates, so they cannot be applied.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

7.7-2

How reproducible:

Everytime.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.yum update
2.
3.
  
Actual results:

--> Finished Dependency Resolution
mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems
  --> Missing Dependency: libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 is needed by package mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.i686 from updates has depsolving problems
  --> Missing Dependency: libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 is needed by package mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.i686 (updates)
Error: Missing Dependency: libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 is needed by package mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
Error: Missing Dependency: libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 is needed by package mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.i686 (updates)
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: package-cleanup --problems
                        package-cleanup --dupes
                        rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

Expected results:

Should download and apply the updates.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Edouard Bourguignon 2010-01-20 07:55:07 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 556743 ***