Bug 559200

Summary: [docs] commandline nfs mount options in RHEL5 not documented
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Alexander Todorov <atodorov>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Ales Kozumplik <akozumpl>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.5CC: jzeleny, pbokoc, rlandman
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: anaconda-11.1.2.210-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
* Previously, the ks=nfs and method=nfs boot options were not documented in the command-line.txt file. Users had to consult documentation outside anaconda itself to learn how to use these boot options. In this release, the ks=nfs and method=nfs boot options are documented, reducing the requirement for users to resort to other documentation to use these boot options. (#559200)
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 432603 Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-13 21:54:18 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alexander Todorov 2010-01-27 12:31:59 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #432603 +++

--- Additional comment from tao on 2008-07-18 14:34:03 EEST ---

I confirmed that I could identify the nfs option with
method=nfs:tcp:nfsserver.example.com:/rhel5/trees.

---

command-line.txt file in anaconda sources doesn't document the existence of nfs mount options for the method command line parameter. It documents those only for the ks parameter.

How to reproduce:
$ grep nfs /usr/share/doc/anaconda-11.1.2.195/command-line.txt 
ks=nfs(:options):<path>   Kickstart from NFS.  NFS mount options are optional.
method=nfs:<path> Use <path> for an NFS installation.


Please document the options syntax. NFS mount options support was added with bug #432603

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2010-07-02 02:49:18 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 4 Ales Kozumplik 2010-07-15 12:04:34 UTC
patch sent for a review.

Comment 5 Ales Kozumplik 2010-07-19 10:44:42 UTC
Fixed by 8e3c69bf1fcf269845ec00d588c673336f6dd6cd, anaconda-11.1.2.210-1.

Comment 7 Alexander Todorov 2010-10-01 13:53:13 UTC
anaconda-11.1.2.216-1

$ grep nfs /usr/share/doc/anaconda-11.1.2.216/command-line.txt 
ks=nfs(:options):<path>   Kickstart from NFS.  NFS mount options are optional.
method=nfs(:options):<path> Use <path> for an NFS installation. NFS mount 

The file reads:
method=nfs(:options):<path> Use <path> for an NFS installation. NFS mount 
                options are optional.

Moving to VERIFIED.

Comment 8 Ruediger Landmann 2011-01-12 02:37:18 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
* Previously, the ks=nfs and method=nfs boot options were not documented 
in the command-line.txt file. Users had to consult documentation outside 
anaconda itself to learn how to use these boot options. In this release, 
the ks=nfs and method=nfs boot options are documented, reducing the 
requirement for users to resort to other documentation to use these boot 
options. (#559200)

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2011-01-13 21:54:18 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0030.html