Bug 559213

FIX - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/sugar-typing-turtle-26-1.fc14.*
sugar-typing-turtle.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
sugar-typing-turtle.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/sugar/activities/TypingTurtle.activity/.pydevproject
sugar-typing-turtle.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/sugar/activities/TypingTurtle.activity/.project
sugar-typing-turtle.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

The 'non-standard-group' warnings can be ignored, but the hidden files should be removed. These are leftovers from eclipse.

OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name}
OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines
OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv3+)
OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license
OK - MUST: license file included in %doc
OK - MUST: spec is in American English
OK - MUST: spec is legible
OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 93c7c18de6d81a18dbf47279ee5e9c69
OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 (noarch)
N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch.
OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
OK - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang
N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
OK - MUST: Package does not bundle copies of system libraries.
N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review.
OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates (none)
OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing
OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...)
OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
OK - MUST: consistently uses macros
OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissible content
N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage
OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application
N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'.
N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package.
N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file.
OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8


SHOULD Items:
OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file.
N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
OK - SHOULD: builds in mock.
OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures.
OK - SHOULD: functions as described.
N/A - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency.
N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg
N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself.


Other items:
OK - latest stable version
OK - SourceURL valid
OK - Compiler flags ok


Issues:
- the command to install the package should be
%{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
instead of
python ./setup.py install --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_prefix}

- remove the hidden files.

These are not blockers, so the package is APPROVED.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: sugar-typing-turtle
Short Description: A multilingual animated touch typing trainer
Owners: sdz
Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13

CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

sugar-typing-turtle-26-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-typing-turtle-26-2.fc12

sugar-typing-turtle-26-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-typing-turtle-26-2.fc13

sugar-typing-turtle-26-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-typing-turtle-26-2.fc11

(In reply to comment #1)

[...]

> Issues:
> - the command to install the package should be
> %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> instead of
> python ./setup.py install --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_prefix}

We discussed this on IRC; it seems like the setup.py file has issues with this invocation.

> - remove the hidden files.

Done before importing!

> These are not blockers, so the package is APPROVED.    

Thanks for the review... :)

sugar-typing-turtle-26-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

sugar-typing-turtle-26-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

sugar-typing-turtle-26-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.