Bug 559312
Summary: | thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ralf Corsepius <rc040203> | ||||
Component: | thunderbird | Assignee: | Gecko Maintainer <gecko-bugs-nobody> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | urgent | ||||||
Version: | 12 | CC: | dash, emcnabb, gecko-bugs-nobody, jeff, knoel, mcepl, mhlavink, mikeb, misek, mjc, sgallagh, sjoerd, steved, twoerner, xavier | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2010-01-28 14:30:00 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Ralf Corsepius
2010-01-27 17:53:17 UTC
This is happen on my laptop where NFS is not involved it all.... Also not only are read emails being marked not read (in my case that's thousands of emails in a very large number of folders), it also destroys all the tags as well.... This is *data corruption* that is costing *everyone* that is using the version 3.0.1 (at Red Hat is a very large number of people) a huge amount of time and pain... At the of the day somebody F-ed something up in 3.0.1 so PLEASE PLEASE fix the problem today or back out the patch that is causing the problem and push out the new release.... because this is a truly truly painful bug Question: How the heck does such a destructive bug get by your testing??? Or am I making assumption you actually do test on minor release like this? (In reply to comment #1) > This is happen on my laptop where NFS is not involved it all.... In my case it's automounted homes, with the account suffering from this issue (my personal one) being located on the same machine as my dovecot is. I.e. on the machine exposing this issue, my account's HOME actually is "bind-mounted". I know, several piece of Gnome/Gtk are unable to handle this setup properly, may-be thunderbird also isn't? > Also not only are read emails being marked not read (in my case that's > thousands of emails in a very large number of folders), it also destroys > all the tags as well.... Yes, I am occasionally experiencing this as well. I am also suspecting me to be loosing mail. However due to the nature of this problem, this is hard to prove - You can't complain about having lost mail, because you've never seen it. You only occasionally experience complaints about you not responding to email, and you not being able to find it when searching for them. FWIW: So far, I have only experienced these issues on x86_64, but not on i386. This could be a coincidents of events (My primary machine is x86_64), but could also indicate 64bit incompatibilities. > At the of the day somebody F-ed something up in 3.0.1 so PLEASE PLEASE > fix the problem today or back out the patch that is causing the problem > and push out the new release.... because this is a truly truly painful bug Fully agreed. To emphasize how unpleasant this bug is: It hit me 3 times within the last hour. (In reply to comment #1) > > Also not only are read emails being marked not read (in my case that's > thousands of emails in a very large number of folders), it also destroys > all the tags as well.... This is *data corruption* that is costing *everyone* > that is using the version 3.0.1 (at Red Hat is a very large number of > people) a huge amount of time and pain... Um, NOT everyone... I use Thunderbird daily to read my work email and I have not seen these issues. > At the of the day somebody F-ed something up in 3.0.1 so PLEASE PLEASE > fix the problem today or back out the patch that is causing the problem > and push out the new release.... because this is a truly truly painful bug > > Question: How the heck does such a destructive bug get by your > testing??? Or am I making assumption you actually do test on > minor release like this? Maybe because not everyone experiences the bug? I'm sure that this is a very painful problem for you but please remain civil and don't over-generalize. (In reply to comment #1) > Question: How the heck does such a destructive bug get by your > testing??? Or am I making assumption you actually do test on > minor release like this? Because we haven't seen it? To me this happened quite rarely (one or two emails every other day or so) and yes I have also local IMAP dovecot. Asking dovecot maintainer to join this party. and there is no NFS at sight for me Hi, this was reported also on dovecot mailing list, the conclusion is thunderbird has broken CONDSTOR support, you should be able to workaround this by turning condstor off. > Seems everyone is starting to notice this now. :) > Yes, there are several flaws and bug reports open with Mozilla on broken > behavior with TB 3.0 and TB 3.0.1. Currently the easiest fix is to turn > off CONDSTOR either server side or in TB itself. There is also a TB > 3.0.2pre nightly available that seems to be working for most people. upstream reports: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540554 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524902 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=517461 and yes, as Matej has said, it usually reproduce itself after a quite long time, so it's hard to spot this during testing. We filed this bug in the upstream database (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540554) and believe that it is more appropriate to let it be resolved upstream. We will continue to track the issue in the centralized upstream bug tracker, and will review any bug fixes that become available for consideration in future updates. Thank you for the bug report. Before we get 3.1 in Fedora a workaround is to disable mail.server.default.use_condstore option. In Edit/Preferences/Advanced/Config editor change the value of this variable to false. > disable mail.server.default.use_condstore option
Just out of curiosity what function or feature am I turning off.
Also, will I have to turn it back on when the problem is resloved?
(In reply to comment #7) > We filed this bug in the upstream database > (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540554) and believe that it is > more appropriate to let it be resolved upstream. > > We will continue to track the issue in the centralized upstream bug tracker, > and will review any bug fixes that become available for consideration in future > updates. In comment #8 you provided what you believe to be a bug fix. => You should be replacing this broken package Red Hat currently is nagging the community with a package which has your "may-be fix" applied. You refuse to do - What am I supposed to think of this? (In reply to comment #3) > Maybe because not everyone experiences the bug? I already had been facing this issue with 3.pre (IIRC, it was Macej who closed a similar bug as "CLOSED UPSTREAM" then). It reappeared 5 minutes after having installed TB-3.0.1. Makes me wonder what you guys are doing. > I'm sure that this is a very > painful problem for you but please remain civil and don't over-generalize. Actually, I consider this thread to be very civil. Only so far: I feel like being abused as @RH's Thunderbird Guinea pig and @RH's Thunderbird to be poorly maintained. (In reply to comment #10) > You refuse to do - What am I supposed to think of this? I don't refuse to do anything ... TB 3.1 is behind the corner, so we will upgrade to it when it is released upstream, which should be soon. Created attachment 387369 [details] Mozilla BZ 540554 patch Matej, F11 and F12 will be getting 3.1? Aren't major FF and TB releases only slated for major Fedora releases? Meaning: TB 3.1 will come only with F13? I have attached the patch, which is slated for TB 3.0.2. Could you not rebuild a 3.0.1 with this patch and push it out? Thanks. (In reply to comment #10) Apologies for having mistyped your name, Matej. (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > You refuse to do - What am I supposed to think of this? > > I don't refuse to do anything ... You refuse to acknowledge and to really fix your bugs. "FIXED/CLOSED UPSTREAM" and "FIXED RAWHIDE" mean to refuse to fix a distro's package's bugs and continue exposing them to these bugs. > TB 3.1 is behind the corner, so we will > upgrade to it when it is released upstream, which should be soon. I am sure, we can expect you guys will have better tested this version than TB-3pre and TB-3.0.1? BTW: Your "may-be fix" seems to work for me. At least, unlike before, I haven't experienced a corrupted index since I activated it ca. 15 minutes ago :-) Now I am still waiting for someone to answer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312#9 I would really like to know what I am doing and which consequences I am likely to be facing. *** Bug 558580 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 566487 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to comment #12) > Created an attachment (id=387369) [details] > Mozilla BZ 540554 patch > > Matej, F11 and F12 will be getting 3.1? Aren't major FF and TB releases only > slated for major Fedora releases? Meaning: TB 3.1 will come only with F13? > > I have attached the patch, which is slated for TB 3.0.2. Could you not rebuild > a 3.0.1 with this patch and push it out? Thanks. I second this request. The bug is really annoying and upstream fixed it. What's the issue with pushing an update with the patch applied ? +1 Please push an update package. This is hurting. Also hitting this regularly. |