Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||'sort -V' sorts alpha parts incorrectly|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Bruce Jerrick <bmj001>|
|Component:||coreutils||Assignee:||Kamil Dudka <kdudka>|
|Status:||CLOSED CANTFIX||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||12||CC:||kdudka, ovasik, twaugh|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2010-09-28 06:13:14 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Bruce Jerrick 2010-01-29 17:47:04 EST
Description of problem: Given input with alpha parts with different lengths, a non-alphanum separator, and a numeric part, 'sort -V' produces incorrect output. It seems to be ignoring length differences of the alpha part even when the separator and numeric parts are the same in all input. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): coreutils-7.6-8.fc12 coreutils-7.2-7.fc11 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: sort -V aaa.1 aaaa.1 ^D Actual results: aaaa.1 aaa.1 Expected results: aaa.1 aaaa.1 Additional info: Without -V, the result is correct. If the '.1' is omitted, result is correct. If just the '.' is omitted, result is correct. Behavior is the same if '-' is used instead of '.' .
Comment 1 Kamil Dudka 2010-01-29 18:11:03 EST
Thank you for filling the bug! > Actual results: > aaaa.1 > aaa.1 Core of the version-compare predicate of 'sort -V' is taken from 'dpkg', which also works that way: $ dpkg --compare-versions aaaa.1 \< aaa.1 && echo LT LT It's partially documented within the 'filevercmp' gnulib module: /* slightly modified verrevcmp function from dpkg S1, S2 - compared string S1_LEN, S2_LEN - length of strings to be scanned This implements the algorithm for comparison of version strings specified by Debian and now widely adopted. The detailed specification can be found in the Debian Policy Manual in the section on the `Version' control field. This version of the code implements that from s5.6.12 of Debian Policy v220.127.116.11 http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version */ I propose to improve the documentation on the coreutils' part as the first step. > Expected results: > aaa.1 > aaaa.1 I don't think we are able to change the implementation to get the result above without breaking anything else. The key problem is that there are different version schemes and either you choose, it will be a trade-off. > If the '.1' is omitted, result is correct. > If just the '.' is omitted, result is correct. same as 'dpkg --compare-versions' > Behavior is the same if '-' is used instead of '.' . This seems to differ from 'dpkg --compare-versions', not yet investigated further.
Comment 2 Kamil Dudka 2010-03-03 05:43:14 EST
(In reply to comment #0) > Actual results: > aaaa.1 > aaa.1 It bails out here: $ printf "aaa.1\naaaa.1\n" > in && gdb -q --args sort -V in (gdb) b filevercmp Breakpoint 1 at 0x409e52: file filevercmp.c, line 134. (gdb) r Breakpoint 1, filevercmp (s1=0x61b4d0 "aaa.1", s2=0x61b4d6 "aaaa.1") at filevercmp.c:134 134 int simple_cmp = strcmp (s1, s2); (gdb) b 97 Breakpoint 2 at 0x409ca4: file filevercmp.c, line 97. (gdb) c Breakpoint 2, verrevcmp (s1=0x61b4d0 "aaa.1", s1_len=5, s2=0x61b4d6 "aaaa.1", s2_len=6) at filevercmp.c:97 97 return s1_c - s2_c; (gdb) print s1[s1_pos] $1 = 46 '.' (gdb) print s2[s2_pos] $2 = 97 'a' (gdb) print s1_c $3 = 302 (gdb) print s2_c $4 = 97
Comment 3 Kamil Dudka 2010-03-03 05:52:01 EST
(In reply to comment #1) > > Behavior is the same if '-' is used instead of '.' . > > This seems to differ from 'dpkg --compare-versions', not yet investigated > further. The difference is in the preprocessing in case of dpkg. When '-' is used, the suffix is cut off before it gets into verrevcmp(): $ gdb -q --args src/dpkg --compare-versions aaa.1 \< aaaa.1 (gdb) b verrevcmp Breakpoint 1 at 0x41e390: file vercmp.c, line 42. (gdb) r Breakpoint 1, verrevcmp (val=0x7466c0 "aaa.1", ref=0x7466d0 "aaaa.1") at vercmp.c:42 $ gdb -q --args src/dpkg --compare-versions aaa-1 \< aaaa-1 (gdb) b verrevcmp Breakpoint 1 at 0x41e390: file vercmp.c, line 42. (gdb) r Breakpoint 1, verrevcmp (val=0x7466c0 "aaa", ref=0x7466d0 "aaaa") at vercmp.c:42
Comment 4 Kamil Dudka 2010-09-28 06:13:14 EDT
I have no idea how to fix it, without breaking anything else. Thanks for understanding! Feel free to reopen as soon as you have a solution.