Bug 560693
Summary: | qmf-agent example (C++) doesn't use automake so it doesn't distribute | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise MRG | Reporter: | Ted Ross <tross> |
Component: | qpid-qmf | Assignee: | messaging-bugs <messaging-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | MRG Quality Engineering <mrgqe-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 1.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 589675 |
Description
Ted Ross
2010-02-01 16:27:21 UTC
I'll take a crack at autotools-ifying this makefile. Question: If this is an example program, does it not make sense to have at least some of the examples not depend on autotools? I've always been supremely grateful when I've had to hack on some piece of code and discovered that it didn't require me to use autotools. Perhaps we should supply an example with autotools, and another without? |