Bug 563056
Summary: | Wrong segmentation from XML to POT when a footnote is present. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] Publican | Reporter: | Manuel Ospina <mospina> |
Component: | publican | Assignee: | Jeff Fearn ๐ <jfearn> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Joshua Wulf <jwulf> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 2.0 | CC: | jfearn, lcarlon, mmcallis, publican-list, runab, yshao |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 1.5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-03-01 00:19:30 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Manuel Ospina
2010-02-09 04:20:48 UTC
An <indexterm> in the middle of a <para> creates the same problem. (In reply to comment #0) > Expected results: > The entry should be left as in the original or there should be two entries: > > 1. The installation program prompts you to set a root password <FOOTNOTE HERE> > for your system. <emphasis>You cannot proceed to the next stage of the > installation process without entering a root password.</emphasis> Implemented this one as I don't have time to do number 2, which is significantly harder to get working reliably. Code change is for footnote and indexterm, you will need to let me know if there are other tags requiring this. I believe this bug is also generating a problem when building the XML: ENGLISH: <para> Red Hat Enterprise Linux divides the included software into <indexterm> <primary>package groups</primary> </indexterm> <firstterm>package groups</firstterm>. For ease of use, the package selection screen displays these groups as categories. </para> ITALIAN: <para> Red Hat Enterprise Linux suddivide il software incluso in <indexterm> <primary>gruppi di pacchetti</primary> </indexterm> </para> The last part of the entry is lost. The generated PO File for the entry is: #. Tag: para #, no-c-format msgid "Red Hat Enterprise Linux divides the included software into" msgstr "Red Hat Enterprise Linux suddivide il software incluso in" # <primary>packages</primary> # /home/pgampe/cvs/en_US/cgs/graphical-rpm.idx: #. Tag: primary #, no-c-format msgid "package groups" msgstr "gruppi di pacchetti" #. Tag: indexterm #, no-c-format msgid "" "<firstterm>package groups</firstterm>. For ease of use, the package " "selection screen displays these groups as categories." msgstr "" "<firstterm>gruppi di pacchetti</firstterm>. Per un utilizzo piรน semplice, la " "schermata di scelta dei pacchetti mostra questi gruppi come categorie." publican-1.5-0.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.5-0.fc12 publican-1.5-0.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.5-0.fc13 publican-1.5-0.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.5-0.fc11 publican-1.5-0.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.5-0.fc12 publican-1.5-0.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.5-0.fc13 publican-1.5-0.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.5-0.fc11 publican-1.5-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. publican-1.5-0.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |