Bug 564585
| Summary: | W: invalid-license PTFL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mathieu Bridon <bochecha> |
| Component: | rpmlint | Assignee: | Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | manuel.wolfshant, tmz, ville.skytta |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | rpmlint-0.95-2.fc13 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-03-03 20:50:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Yes, it seems that a number of font licenses including PTFL have fallen through the cracks when rpmlint's list of licenses have been synced with Wiki. Will fix in the next package revision. rpmlint-0.95-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpmlint-0.95-2.fc13 rpmlint-0.95-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpmlint-0.95-2.fc12 rpmlint-0.95-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. rpmlint-0.95-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |
Rpmlint identifies the PTFL as an invalid license, but it is listed as a Fedora good license : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses_4 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Fonts/ParaType_Font_License Could it be added to the list of good licenses that rpmlint knows?