Bug 565100

Summary: FTBFS sirius-0.8.0-15.fc12: ImplicitDSOLinking
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: FTBFS <ftbfs>
Component: siriusAssignee: Bruno Wolff III <bruno>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: rawhideCC: bruno, jan.klepek, makghosh, mtasaka
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-10 16:51:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 564245, 583278    
Attachments:
Description Flags
root.log
none
build.log
none
mock.log
none
root.log
none
build.log
none
mock.log
none
Spec file patch
none
Updated autotools run patch including -lm fix none

Description FTBFS 2010-02-13 17:54:07 UTC
sirius-0.8.0-15.fc12.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.
This failure is due to a change in the linker default behavior, which uncovered a fault in your package.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking .
If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT change the component in this bug or close this bug.  Instead, add the appropriate bug number from the other package to the "Depends on" line in this bug.  If the other package does not yet have a bug created that you think matches, please create one.  Doing so helps us properly track bugs and their dependencies, just as we track package dependencies.  (If you close this bug, and the other package is not fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created.  Please follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.)

Comment 1 FTBFS 2010-02-13 17:54:11 UTC
Created attachment 393518 [details]
root.log

root.log for i386

Comment 2 FTBFS 2010-02-13 17:54:13 UTC
Created attachment 393519 [details]
build.log

build.log for i386

Comment 3 FTBFS 2010-02-13 17:54:14 UTC
Created attachment 393520 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for i386

Comment 4 FTBFS 2010-02-13 17:54:16 UTC
Created attachment 393521 [details]
root.log

root.log for x86_64

Comment 5 FTBFS 2010-02-13 17:54:17 UTC
Created attachment 393522 [details]
build.log

build.log for x86_64

Comment 6 FTBFS 2010-02-13 17:54:19 UTC
Created attachment 393523 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for x86_64

Comment 7 Bug Zapper 2010-03-15 14:56:15 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 13 development cycle.
Changing version to '13'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 8 Bruno Wolff III 2010-05-01 14:19:25 UTC
There are two problems with the build. One seems to be incorrect handling of thread setup. Rerunning autogen.sh fixes that, so this might be something already fixed upstream. I think a more targeted patch is the way to handle this if there isn't an upstream fixed update yet, since running autotools during the package build process can cause problems down the road.
The second problem is that the package uses the math library but doesn't include that dependency in the automake Makefile. That change should get pushed upstream if possible.

Comment 9 Bruno Wolff III 2010-05-01 15:30:49 UTC
Created attachment 410693 [details]
Spec file patch

It doesn't look like there is an updated autotools build upstream and they haven't had a release in a few years, so I am going to guess one isn't going to be forthcoming any time soon. The pthread bug seemed likely be be in libtool, but there wasn't an obvious simple patch to it. So the approach I took was to add the -lm in src/Makefile.am, rerun ./autogen.sh and then make the difference a patch. This will freeze the autotools version so that later updates won't break things needlessly.

Comment 10 Bruno Wolff III 2010-05-01 15:32:46 UTC
Created attachment 410694 [details]
Updated autotools run patch including -lm fix

Comment 11 Jan Klepek 2011-03-13 19:30:20 UTC
build is working, closing ticket

Comment 12 Jan Klepek 2011-03-13 19:31:06 UTC
sorry, wrong bug closed :/ issue persists

Comment 13 Jan Klepek 2011-03-13 19:43:06 UTC
Hi,

Do you need any help with this bug? Do you have any progress on this issue?

Comment 14 Bug Zapper 2011-06-02 16:32:03 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 13.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '13'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 13's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 13 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 15 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-21 06:30:26 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 16 Bruno Wolff III 2011-06-23 13:26:14 UTC
I'll be looking at this more closely now that I am the package owner.
Upstream has vanished. If the changes are simple I'll just keep patches. If things get more involved, having a fedorahosted area might be a good idea, to share the fixes more easily.