Bug 56592
Summary: | what will rpm do if I -F * | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Need Real Name <george> |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Jeff Johnson <jbj> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.2 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-11-21 19:29:41 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Need Real Name
2001-11-21 15:41:24 UTC
Correction: this happened on a 6.2 system, but presumed true for 7.2 as well. Similar request for enhanced test function http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56592 Similar request to add logging enhancement http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20177 If you take the -h off, you will see what package you updated. Yes, there's a problem with the progress bars if the output is not to a tty. I have the fix, but removing -h is the workaround for now. Yes I should have avoided -h here, but the main issue is determining beforehand which rpms will be installed from a directory of updates when rpm is given -F There is no clean way to do it. Since my original post I've learned to use --test -F -vv which contains quite a lot of info I don't need, but can grep the required info... find . -name \*rpm -type f |grep -v -e /[i486,i586,athlon]\*/ |grep -v kernel | xargs rpm --test -Fvv &> temp ; grep package temp | grep files I was able to determine which packages were upgraded in my original post with "rpm -qa --last" too. // George |