Bug 566694

Summary: Rebase of rhnlib
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Component: rhnlibAssignee: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Jiri Kastner <jkastner>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.5CC: jhutar, jkastner, jpazdziora, mzazrivec, rlerch
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Rebase
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Release notes draft: rhnlib has been rebased to 2.5.22, which will be required by future version of RHN Satellite.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-30 09:08:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 541103    

Description Miroslav Suchý 2010-02-19 13:19:10 UTC
Description of problem:
In Satellite 5.4 we will require rhnlib >= 2.5.20, it will save us one future async errata if we do rebase now, when we will be doing errata for rhnlib anyway.

Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2010-02-19 14:09:15 UTC
Commited to svn as rev 190936

Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2010-02-19 14:40:17 UTC
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.

New Contents:
Release notes draft:
rhnlib has been rebased to 2.5.22, which will be required by future version of RHN Satellite.

Comment 6 Miroslav Suchý 2010-02-22 15:29:31 UTC
Forgot to add one file. rev. 190983

Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2010-03-30 09:08:24 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0322.html