Bug 567706
| Summary: | F-13-Alpha-RC2 default contains unresolved deps - xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-0.20100205gite75dd23.fc13.x86_64 requires kernel-drm-nouveau = 15 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | James Laska <jlaska> |
| Component: | xorg-x11-drv-nouveau | Assignee: | David Cantrell <dcantrell> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 13 | CC: | airlied, ajax, awilliam, bskeggs, jturner, robatino |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-02-24 19:02:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 538273 | ||
there's a newer version of nouveau that should be in the build. as the update notes say: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mesa-7.8-0.18.fc13,xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-2.20100218git2964702.fc13,kernel-2.6.33-0.47.rc8.git1.fc13,libdrm-2.4.18-0.1.fc13 "This breaks the driver ABI, so all pieces required." I guess RC2 pulled a newer kernel without the matching nouveau / libdrm - not Ben's fault. re-assigning to releng. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers forgot 'mesa' in the above list. Why doesn't the procedure in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure pick this up? (Not familiar with the repoclosure command.) (In reply to comment #3) > Why doesn't the procedure in > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure > > pick this up? (Not familiar with the repoclosure command.) Well, I can say we figured out why the automated rats_sanity test was not discovering this issue. Will Woods found a bug and provided an update. http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=autoqa.git;a=commit;h=deb0d2bacde2173e40d5faff04b810ebc5a4c438 Interestingly, when I run the above test case with the '-n' repoclosure flag, it correctly finds this failure. $ repoclosure --repofrompath=media,/media -a x86_64 -a noarch -r media -n Added media repo from /media Reading in repository metadata - please wait.... Checking Dependencies Repos looked at: 1 media Num Packages in Repos: 3256 package: 1:xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-0.20100205gite75dd23.fc13.x86_64 from media unresolved deps: kernel-drm-nouveau = 0:15 Let's continue discussion on the test.org mailing list I've fixed this in later RC composes to include the newer nouveau driver. |
Description of problem: Attempting a default installs of F-13-Alpha-RC2 results in a dependency conflict. 1:xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-0.20100205gite75dd23.fc13.x86_64 requires kernel-drm-nouveau = 15 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): * xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-0.20100205gite75dd23.fc13.x86_64 How reproducible: * every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Perform a default package install of F-13-Alpha-RC2 (or just use @base and @base-x comps.xml groups) Actual results: The install stops with the following prompt ┌──────────────────────────┤ Warning ├───────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Some of the packages you have selected for install are │ │ missing dependencies. You can exit the installation, │ │ go back and change your package selections, or continue │ │ installing these packages without their dependencies. │ │ │ │ 1:xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-0.20100205gite75dd23.fc13.x86_ ↑ │ │ 64 requires kernel-drm-nouveau = 15 ▮ │ │ ▒ │ │ ▒ │ │ ▒ │ │ ↓ │ │ │ │ ┌────────────────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────────┐ │ │ │ Exit installer │ │ Back │ │ Continue │ │ │ └────────────────┘ └──────┘ └──────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ Expected results: Clean deps in the default install. Additional info: * Raising as an Alpha release blocker (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Alpha_Release_Criteria) per criteria ... "No file conflicts or unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (CD/DVD) install "