Bug 567751

Summary: Recent upgrade to log4net has broken nant
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Andrew Stitcher <astitcher>
Component: nantAssignee: Paul F. Johnson <paul>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: kalevlember, paul
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-02-23 23:51:26 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Andrew Stitcher 2010-02-23 20:20:33 UTC
Description of problem:

When running nant you get the following output:

** (/usr/lib64/NAnt/bin/NAnt.exe:1726): WARNING **: The following assembly referenced from /usr/lib64/NAnt/bin/NAnt.exe could not be loaded:
     Assembly:   log4net    (assemblyref_index=1)
     Version:    1.2.10.0
     Public Key: 2a6b8347ed52b694
The assembly was not found in the Global Assembly Cache, a path listed in the MONO_PATH environment variable, or in the location of the executing assembly (/usr/lib64/NAnt/bin/).


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

nant-0.85-32.fc12.x86_64
log4net-1.2.10-12.fc12.x86_64

How reproducible:
Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1.nant
  
Actual results:

** (/usr/lib64/NAnt/bin/NAnt.exe:1726): WARNING **: The following assembly referenced from /usr/lib64/NAnt/bin/NAnt.exe could not be loaded:
     Assembly:   log4net    (assemblyref_index=1)
     Version:    1.2.10.0
     Public Key: 2a6b8347ed52b694
The assembly was not found in the Global Assembly Cache, a path listed in the MONO_PATH environment variable, or in the location of the executing assembly (/usr/lib64/NAnt/bin/).


Expected results:
No error

Additional info:

Comment 1 Kalev Lember 2010-02-23 23:51:26 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 562729 ***