Bug 568784

Summary: Error updating openoffice with langpacks
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mattia Verga <mattia.verga>
Component: yum-langpacksAssignee: Jens Petersen <petersen>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: i18n-bugs, petersen
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-02-28 12:02:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Output of yum with error none

Description Mattia Verga 2010-02-26 15:54:53 UTC
Created attachment 396572 [details]
Output of yum with error

Description of problem:
When I try to update openoffice from updates-testing repo (from 3.2.0-12.6 to 3.2.0-12.7) the package openoffice.org-langpack-it.x86_64 1:3.2.0-12.7.fc13 is correctly selected, but at the end of dependencies check I get an error throwed in by yum-langpack plugin (see the attached output).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
yum.noarch                         3.2.26-4.fc13 
yum-langpacks.noarch                 0.1.4-2.fc13
openoffice.org-core.x86_64                     1:3.2.0-12.6.fc13 
openoffice.org-langpack-it.x86_64              1:3.2.0-12.6.fc13


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Enable updates-testing repo
2.Try to update openoffice with IT langpack from 3.2.0-12.6 to 3.2.0-12.7
  
Actual results:
Yum quits with error in checking dependencies

Expected results:
It should work

Comment 1 Mattia Verga 2010-02-26 15:59:58 UTC
Sorry, this is a F13 bug, not Rawhide...

Comment 2 Mattia Verga 2010-02-28 12:02:02 UTC
With today openoffice 3.2.0-12.8 the update went fine also with le language pack...

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2010-03-04 05:30:37 UTC
Wonder if this is bug 569352?

Comment 4 Mattia Verga 2010-03-04 15:18:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Wonder if this is bug 569352?    

That bug seems the same as mine... I had problems updating from 3.2.0-12.6 to 3.2.0-12.7, but the update went fine from 3.2.0-12.6 to 3.2.0-12.8.
Maybe this bug is triggered by some problem with the 3.2.0-12.7 package only.