Bug 569080
| Summary: | [abrt] crash in gnote-0.7.1-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/gnote was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Cia Watson <cia.watson> | ||||
| Component: | 0xFFFF | Assignee: | Rahul Sundaram <metherid> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dodji, dwmw2, jspaleta, metherid | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:7a007c1b6ac2be275ccba55a5ed538d5ab9a5e11 | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2010-03-01 04:14:24 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Cia Watson
2010-02-28 00:25:54 UTC
Created attachment 396810 [details]
File: backtrace
A stack trace would be useful as the current attached one is incomplete and the manual process is described at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces (In reply to comment #2) > A stack trace would be useful as the current attached one is incomplete and the > manual process is described at > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces It looks like this is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568905 created by Adam W.Though that one is on the x86_64 platform and mine's i386 / 686. If you still want the backtrace please advise. or I can close this but I'm not sure how to do that pointing to it being a dupe. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > or I can close this but I'm not sure how to do that pointing to it being a > dupe. I see below the comment area there is a link to mark it as a duplicate which I can do if you want? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 568905 *** |