Bug 57256
Summary: | Rebuild RHSA-2001:027-02 RPMS for 7.0J | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Component: | sgml-tools | Assignee: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.0J | CC: | ynakai |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-03-26 12:38:27 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ben Levenson
2001-12-07 22:50:29 UTC
adding ynakai to Cc: I've put the new sgml-tools at /home/devel/ynakai/For7.0.1j/sgml-tools-1.0.9-9j1.src.rpm Thanks. In which collection should I build that package? Also, presumably Red Hat Linux 6.2J also needs a separate package..? Yes, but we have not made any 6.2J errata. And we have 7.0tc(Chinese) and 7.1k(Korean) as other forked version. It's better to do for them. > Yes, but we have not made any 6.2J errata. So what do I do? :-) > And we have 7.0tc(Chinese) and 7.1k(Korean) as other forked version. > It's better to do for them. There don't seem to be forked sgml-tools packages for those distributions, so are separate errata needed for them? They shouldn't be. closing, 7.0 is not supported from next week. |