Bug 57261
Summary: | expand md limit beyond 12 drives | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Jim Wright <jwright> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Doug Ledford <dledford> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.2 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-02-19 16:49:28 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jim Wright
2001-12-07 23:38:54 UTC
"12" is a bogus limit indeed; the real limit is 27 and we're evaluating if a fix for that is enough to warrant a raidtools erratum. Above 27 is not possible without changing the on-disk format and as a result is rather more invasive.... 27 would be helpful for us, especially if it is easy to do. Sounds like going past 27 is something for 8.0. I haven't tried lately, but is this better in recent kernels? current limit still is 27 ;( there is a on-disk layout change required for going above that, and THAT needs upstream buy-in and such sorry for not being clear. I haven't tested lately if the limit of 12 has been removed so the 27 limit can be reached. I agree that exceeding the 27 limit is an upstream issue and not an easy question. > 12 should work in current kernels.
|