Bug 57266
Summary: | A stray file creates an extra entry in the control-center menu tree | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide | Reporter: | Bill Crawford <billc> |
Component: | gtkhtml | Assignee: | Havoc Pennington <hp> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 1.0 | CC: | d95mback |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-02-26 21:12:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Bill Crawford
2001-12-08 02:56:51 UTC
Blah, gtkhtml probably expects the newer control center shell. No plans to upgrade to that so will probably just move gtkhtml-properties.desktop gtkhtml also provides the following files: /etc/CORBA/servers /usr/bin /usr/share/control-center /usr/share/control-center/Documents /usr/share/control-center/capplet /usr/share/gnome /usr/share/gnome/apps /usr/share/gnome/apps/Settings /usr/share/gnome/apps/Settings/Documents /usr/share/gnome/html /usr/share/oaf which are provided by other, more basic packages, and should not be provided by the gtkhtml package. I've probably missed a few here as well. All of these will trigger the nasty "directory is not empty" when removing the rpm, at least I think so. On a side note, doing tpm -qf /usr/bin gives the following: filesystem-2.0.7-1 koffice-2.0.1-2 kdegames-2.1.1-1 kdegraphics-2.1.1-1 klyx-0.11-2 gtkhtml-1.0.0-1 so there are more packages than just gtkhtml that does this thing. This isn't necessarily a bad thing with shared paths ... it means that whatever order you remove packages, as long as all the files get removed, so do the paths. If you remove packages on Solaris, for example, you'll see messages like "Not removing share path /foo/bar/fum" ... Having multiple packages own a directory is OK, though owning /usr/bin is a bit silly it's also harmless. |