Bug 572989

I'll review this one.

There's a few minor rpmlint bits that need to be fixed but everything else is OK. The job control errors in particular. I think the rest are OK.

So I'm approving this but please fix the rpmlint issues before commit.

APPROVED 

- rpmlint output

$ rpmlint sugar-paint.spec sugar-paint-27-1.fc12.src.rpm sugar-paint-27-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm sugar-paint-debuginfo-27-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm
sugar-paint.spec:10: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
sugar-paint.spec: E: specfile-error sh: line 0: fg: no job control
sugar-paint.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
sugar-paint.src: E: specfile-error sh: line 0: fg: no job control
sugar-paint.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
sugar-paint.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/fill/_fill.so
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings.

+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ latest version packaged

+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
  d9523e113a725c19753af9e0766bbe00  paint-27.xo
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
  tested using koji scratch build
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
+ %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
n/a no duplicate files in %files
+ Package perserves timestamps on install
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8

Optional:

n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
+ reviewer should build the package in mock/koji
+ the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
n/a review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: sugar-paint
Short Description: Paint activity for Sugar
Owners: sdz pbrobinson
Branches: F-13 F-12 F-11

CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

Built in Rawhide and others, update being on its way soon. Thanks for the review!