Bug 574804

Summary:	missing symbolic link for quotaoff man page
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Ondrej Vasik <ovasik>
Component:	quota	Assignee:	Petr Pisar <ppisar>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Martin Cermak <mcermak>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.6	CC:	azelinka, mcermak, mmalik, steved
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	quota-3.13-2.el5	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	436110	Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-01-13 22:10:30 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	436110
Bug Blocks:

Description Ondrej Vasik 2010-03-18 15:21:53 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #436110 +++

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; cs-CZ; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080208 Fedora/2.0.0.12-1.fc8 Firefox/2.0.0.12

Description of problem:
The quotaon man page claims that it is common for both utilities quotaon and quotaoff, but you cannot get man page for quotaoff when you write "man quotaoff".  There should be a symbolic link which will point from quotaoff.8.gz to quotaon.8.gz.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
quota-3.12-7

How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. man quotaoff


Actual Results:
You see following message:

No manual entry for quotaoff


Expected Results:
You see the man page which is common for both utilities quotaon and quotaoff.

Additional info:

--- Additional comment from ovasik on 2008-03-06 02:19:59 EST ---

Thanks for report, fixed in Fedora rawhide branch as quota-3.15-5.fc9 .

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-01-13 22:10:30 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0023.html