Bug 576688

Summary: libguestfs doesn't work on el5.4 host talking to a f12 guest running an ext4 fs
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: seth vidal <svidal>
Component: libguestfsAssignee: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: el5CC: mbooth, rjones, tcallawa, virt-maint
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: libguestfs-1.2.2-1.fc13 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-04-08 19:13:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description seth vidal 2010-03-24 20:31:45 UTC
get_e2uuid: /sbin/tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open /dev/vda1

Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock. at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Sys/Guestfs/Lib.pm line 735.

Comment 1 Richard W.M. Jones 2010-03-24 20:34:14 UTC
The problem is that on RHEL 5, the ext4 utilities were in a
separate package and all had separate names (eg. mke4fs
instead of mke2fs).  These programs can in fact create
and handle ext2/3 as well, so on RHEL 5 we should just use
them unconditionally.

We already got this right for mke4fs:

http://git.annexia.org/?p=libguestfs.git;a=blob;f=daemon/ext2.c;h=85ddce52525b1fca02dd8ac524f81a0f64ead93f;hb=HEAD#l339

but not for tune4fs etc., so that is what we need to change.

Comment 2 Richard W.M. Jones 2010-03-24 22:04:30 UTC
Patch posted upstream:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2010-March/msg00124.html

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2010-03-25 08:40:37 UTC
libguestfs-1.0.85-1.el5.9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libguestfs-1.0.85-1.el5.9

Comment 4 Richard W.M. Jones 2010-03-25 08:43:06 UTC
Please try this backport which fixes the issue for me.

There is another semi-related ext4 bug that we found
in the guestfs_e2fsck_l command[1].  However unless
you are resizing ext4 partitions, it shouldn't affect you.
If you _are_ resizing ext4 partitions, let me know and I
will backport this fix also.

[1] http://git.annexia.org/?p=libguestfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=00a9ae7365e6bad258bcf079a18dcae94d0853ad

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2010-03-27 02:31:14 UTC
libguestfs-1.0.85-1.el5.9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libguestfs'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libguestfs-1.0.85-1.el5.9

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2010-04-07 22:15:37 UTC
libguestfs-1.0.85-1.el5.9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libguestfs'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libguestfs-1.0.85-1.el5.9

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2010-04-08 19:13:08 UTC
libguestfs-1.0.85-1.el5.9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2010-04-09 14:10:30 UTC
libguestfs-1.2.1-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libguestfs-1.2.1-1.fc13

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2010-04-13 07:44:04 UTC
libguestfs-1.2.2-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libguestfs-1.2.2-1.fc13

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2010-04-30 23:47:13 UTC
libguestfs-1.2.2-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.