Bug 577290

Summary:	seamonkey 2.x for F11? unresolved security issues in 1.x
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	long
Component:	seamonkey	Assignee:	Martin Stransky <stransky>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	11	CC:	caillon, gecko-bugs-nobody, kengert, stransky
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	seamonkey-1.1.19-1.fc11	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-04-21 21:53:26 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description long 2010-03-26 16:07:46 UTC

Description of problem:
Just wondering when we will be getting seamonkey 2.x for F11?  As stated on http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ "For the few who can't afford that, a last 1.x release that does fix a few, but not all security issues, is available as SeaMonkey 1.1.19."

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
seamonkey-1.1.18-1.fc11.x86_64

How reproducible:
n/a

Steps to Reproduce:
1. n/a
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
n/a

Expected results:
n/a

Additional info:

Comment 1 long 2010-04-20 17:12:03 UTC

*chirp* *chirp* *chirp*

anyone here?

Comment 2 Martin Stransky 2010-04-20 19:51:29 UTC

Uff, okay, adding to queue.

Comment 3 Martin Stransky 2010-04-21 10:40:32 UTC

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-1.1.19-1.fc11

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2010-04-21 10:41:50 UTC

seamonkey-1.1.19-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-1.1.19-1.fc11

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2010-04-21 21:53:21 UTC

seamonkey-1.1.19-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 6 long 2010-04-22 19:29:17 UTC

Thanks, and sorry for being a PITA but I'm wondering if the security issues that were not fixed in 1.1.19 are anything to be worried about (e.g. remote code execution).