Bug 577302
| Summary: | Missing Device ID for HP PhotoSmart 380 (Bluetooth) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
| Component: | hplip | Assignee: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 13 | CC: | jpopelka, twaugh |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-05-07 04:01:42 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 568351 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 219467 | ||
|
Description
Tim Waugh
2010-03-26 16:29:22 UTC
If I add the second 1284DeviceID attribute like
{
ModelName "HP Photosmart 380 Series"
Attribute "NickName" "" "HP Photosmart 380 Series, $Version"
Attribute "ShortNickName" "" "HP Photosmart 380 Series"
Attribute "1284DeviceID" "" "MFG:HP;MDL:photosmart 380 series;DES:photosmart 380 series;"
+ Attribute "1284DeviceID" "" "MFG:HP;MDL:Photosmart 380 series_BT;DES:385;"
PCFileName "hp-photosmart_380_series.ppd"
Attribute "Product" "" "(HP Photosmart 385 Compact Photo Printer)"
Attribute "Product" "" "(HP Photosmart 385xi Compact Photo Printer)"
Attribute "Product" "" "(HP Photosmart 385v Compact Photo Printer)"
}
the check-device-ids.py still marks it as MISSING.
"It" probably takes only the first 1284DeviceID attribute, because when I add it as first 1284DeviceID attribute check-device-ids.py finds it, but then
./check-device-ids.py "HP Photosmart 380" "MFG:HP;MDL:Photosmart 380 series;" (without _BT) marks it as MISSING.
Only solution I have is to add new entry with different 1284DeviceID.
That's actually a bug in my RPM provides script: see bug #568351. It's perfectly valid for a PPD to contain several 1284DeviceID attributes; I just didn't realise that when I wrote the script. For cases like this, let's add the additional 1284DeviceIDs anyway -- the RPM provides script will eventually get fixed and pick them up. hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update hplip'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |