Bug 578382
Summary: | PrintServiceLookup.lookupPrintServices(DocFlavor.SERVICE_FORMATTED.PAGEABLE, null) in a simple test java program fails to list printers when run with gcj - Any conventional JRE seems to work that I have tested | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Michael Kearey <mkearey> |
Component: | gcc | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-tools-bugs |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.4 | CC: | aph, iannis, jakub, mnowak, pmuller, tao, twaugh, wmealing |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | gcc-4.1.2-49.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-01-13 23:57:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Michael Kearey
2010-03-31 06:18:21 UTC
Why do you file this against gcc44 and against RHEL5? gcc44 shipped in RHEL5 never included Java support (and the latest gcc44 there is 4.4.0-6.el5 anyway) and gcj in RHEL5 is 4.1.x-ish. gcj in RHEL6 is going to be 4.4.3-ish or later, 4.4.1-2 is Fedora 11 update. As Mike is away on leave, I am watching his queue. The source rpm for libgcj seems to be gcc-4.1.2-46.el5.src.rpm so I'll file this against gcc for el5. Feel free to move it to where it needs to be so that it can get the correct visibility to the engineering who can work on it. Which component should it be filed against ? In gcc-4.1.2-49.el5 An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0025.html *** Bug 651381 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |